By Unsah Malik
Mon, 3 March 2014
Remember them square-shaped plastic things we used to carry with us everywhere back in the days, going by the name ‘floppy disks’? If you’re anything like us, you certainly do, because at one point in life, it was your life.
But for artist Nick Gentry, a Central Saint Martins graduate, it meant a great deal more. We’re not talking about saving pages of Word Art after hours of deliberating between fonts and fill colours, mind, because Nick’s creative mastermind saw, and still sees, beyond that.
Influenced by “the development of consumerism, technology, identity and cyber culture in society”, Nick has gained a phenomenal reputation worldwide for his aptitude in using crafty techniques, most notable from his (absolute genius) use of old floppy disks. And, as if that doesn’t sound impressive enough, the value of his art increases by a mega 80% each year.
So when SUITCASE was presented the opportunity to interview the talent himself, of course we had our questions at the ready...
SUITCASE MAGAZINE: Your work appears to have been inspired by technology from the beginning. How has this come about and evolved during your career?
NICK GENTRY: The overriding investigation for me is about identity, but it’s clear that technology is having an ever-increasing impact on who we are. The technological changes that have happened in the past ten years or so have really influenced my life. Collectively, we are driven and committed to this technological advancement, perhaps more than anything else. As a result we are getting much closer to technology, almost to the point where we are completely meshed with it and the boundary between human and machine is increasingly becoming blurred. This transition brings up so many new questions about our shared human identity.
SM: It’s interesting that you choose to allow others to donate materials for your pieces. Have you always used this method in the production process and have you ever regretted your decision to let others be so involved in the process?
NG: The open process evolved mostly of its own accord. I started off going out and trying to find these old materials but after a while, through exhibiting and sharing my work it became clear to more people that they could contribute. It’s not a traditional approach, but I’m not precious about ‘owning’ all aspects of the creative process, so there is nothing to regret about that. In fact I find it inspiring that people from all over the world that seemly have no connection can come together for a simple creative purpose. Primarily, I want to find new ways to make art. I still have control, but the beauty of each piece isn’t so much in the craft or any of my direct work. Instead the emphasis has shifted more towards the spirit of the project. Something about it feels right that it works in a complete cycle.
SM: You’ve said that the small clues left on labels from the donations help to create the story behind each piece. How do you evolve each story, and are there any other elements that help create this?
NG: The labels often form the titles of each piece. Aside from that, the connections that are made are entirely the viewer’s own. I’m not going to prescribe a particular interpretation for each painting that I create as I think that would destroy the openness of the art. It’s not so much about one story, but more about showing how lots of different stories can overlap.
SM: Talk about your choice to focus on portraiture specifically. Are any of your portraits based on specific subjects?
NG: Portraiture is something that has always come naturally to me. Faces give us a feeling about where we have been and who we are. It’s a pure and direct way to examine identity. I have based my work on real people before, but mostly I don’t even consider the faces to be human. The materials form the subject, so in a sense I don’t even regard the faces as the true subject of the work. With my work it’s probably more about what is inside (or what is hidden), rather than what you see on the surface.
SM: You’ve been described as a street artist and have showcased with other street artists including Banksy. Would you consider yourself as one?
NG: I don’t consider myself to be a street artist as I don’t work in the street. I’m perfectly happy in my studio. I don’t place much importance on categories and a lot of my favourite artworks defy categorisation entirely. I tend to gravitate to the spaces in-between, in the areas that are harder to define.
SM: Have you always wanted to be an artist? Was there a particular inspiration that helped you decide to go down this career path?
NG: Ever since I can remember I have always wanted to be an artist. From a very early age I was lucky to have the support of my parents and some teachers, which really helped me to believe that it could be possible.
SM: You’ve shown your work all over the globe. Are you inspired by any particularly cultures or locations?
NG: Living in London allows me to appreciate the fascinating mix of cultures that we have. For me, the focus isn’t on any one particular culture. You can see in my work that it is about collecting disparate objects and fusing them together.
SM: If you could show your work anywhere in the world, where would it be and why?
NG: New York is the place that I am going to show next, at C24 Gallery in June. It’s a city that I admire from afar and I have wanted to show there for a long time. Like London, it’s bursting with energy and fully embraces the future.
SM: Is there a particular place that you escape to for either relaxation or inspiration for your artwork? What five items would you bring with you?
NG: When I need to reflect on everything I go to the countryside, to a small village just outside London called Harpenden. When I’m there, I like to light a fire and allow the flames to take over my immediate thoughts. The city is often so much about control that I find it’s necessary from time to time to let go completely. I would take a sketchbook, a bottle of Amarone, a pot of green tea, a book and my bicycle.